minor ldms_core touchup

Posted by Jack Coates Jul 7, 2008

 

In calculating the amount of time that an eventually patched patch remains unpatched (say that three times fast), I was not CASTING to a BIGINT, but rather leaving it at the default SQL INT. Ergo, if you patch patches after 90 days or so, you'd get a non-fatal SQL error from ldms_core. You'll want to upgrade, from here: http://www.droppedpackets.org/scripts/ldms_core

 

 

For everyone else, nothing to see here, move along. I did some code clean up but haven't really started on the big stuff for the 3.0 release.

 

 

0 Comments Permalink

OpenSuSE disappointments

Posted by Jack Coates Jul 7, 2008

 

One of the things that I've always liked about Linux is its excellent package management systems. Building an RPM or DEB is definitely a lot harder than NSIS or InstallShield, but the end result is a solid thing indeed. Thanks to the dependency checking in these package formats, I've been able to do successful in-place upgrades for many years on Mandrake (now Mandriva), Red Hat, and Debian systems. It's really simple -- you just change the source media from the current release to the release you want and tell it to go. If it's a major upgrade, you can even do it in chunks, rebooting between steps.

 

 

So, I was rather disappointed a few months ago when I went to upgrade some rather antiquated OpenSuSE releases on a couple of servers and found that the good folks at Novell have specifically disabled this capability. Furthermore, they discourage upgrading at all, recommending a clean install. That's not bad advice for Windows, with its mediocre packaging and 5-year release cycle. It's even okay advice for OSX, with its sadly primitive packaging and 1.5 year release cycle. But a Linux distribution with a 6-month release cycle and perpetual beta codebase is another matter.

 

 

As long as I had to go down into the crawlspace, take the server apart to get a DVD drive into its boot order, and reformat the system partition anyway, I might as well change the OS to something that can handle upgrading. This was back in November, and I switched it to a stable release of Xubuntu.  The speed increase was immediate, and I've since done two in-place upgrades without disrupting anything or physically touching the box. I won't be using OpenSuSE again... having to physically visit and rebuild the white-box junkpile in my crawlspace is one thing, but the rackmount server at a data center in another state is far worse. Too bad its hardware is too old to handle IDE-R.

 

 

0 Comments Permalink
LANDesk Community powered by Jive Software's Clearspace ® Subscribe| Legal Notices| Investor Relations| Avocent| Privacy Policy © 2009 LANDesk Software